New Delhi: September 15, 2007 – There is something deeper than to withdraw the ASI’s affidavit on the Sethusamudram project in court. The Govt. wants to play a good political game.  It sought for three months from the Supreme Court of India just it wants to test its own fate within this period.

As per Indian Exparess, “The Indian government was supposed to give the ASI’s affidavit a burial at sea and get on with defending the Sethusamudram project in court. So why did it ask the court for three more months? Also, why is the government discovering the importance of asking for more opinion at this stage.

After all, the government has been arguing, and the Congress has been saying in political briefings, that the details of the project, including which of the six possible routes should be chosen, were cleared during the NDA government.

The impression therefore is not only that of over-correction following the affidavit goof, it also seems the government is not opposed to a change in the project’s specifications. Maybe what government strategists have in mind is that if there is enough ‘democratic’ opinion, it can graciously agree to a revision and argue that it is responding to reasoned critique.

We could have said this looks like the Sethusamudram project will be given the same political treatment as the nuclear deal was. Except that the UPA is firm in keeping the deal going in its present form. It is important to remember in this context that petitioners like Subaramanian Swamy aren’t asking for the project to be scrapped.

They simply want the so-called Ram Sethu to be left out of the plans. If the government agrees to build the project but abandon the route it was defending for so long, there will be an ungodly meeting of minds.
 
UPA ‘atonement’: Affidavits withdrawn, review promised, 2 ASI officials suspended Sethu: DMK irked by Govt’s rollback move, How did the para get in? Govt knew of ASI affidavit days before it was made public BJP lacks credibility to speak on Sethu: Uma Advani ups the ante, wants PM to apologise.

Express India BBC News CNN
There will also be some explaining to do. The National Environmental Engineering Institute (NEERI) had advocated the current route by saying it was the least environmentally damaging.

Another route, alignment 4, that was chosen earlier as being the most economically viable was later set aside after extensive consultations.

Techno-economic-environmental parameters like these cannot be revised on the basis on politically convenient ‘democratic’ opinion. This is, may we remind all the political actors, a serious infrastructure project.

Of course, the Congress is looking at a serious political project, early elections. The three months breather it asked for and received would be roughly the period during which this government’s fate may be decided.

The desperation to deny the BJP an emotive talking point is clearly understood. What is not is why the government thought that withdrawing the affidavits won’t be enough.

Why can’t the government make the distinction between the needless para in the ASI affidavit and the science that backs the project? Why’s the Congress so nervous?

Print Version

Go Back

Applelounge Network (Website Design India, Web Design India) Sites
Astrology India | Google Sitemaps | Matrimonial | Coaching Jobs

About Us | Advertise With Us | Write for Us | Contact Us | IR Syndicate | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Copyright © 2008 Media International Limited. All Rights Reserved.